A milestone in the study of Consciousness

In July 2012, a significant event took place at the University of Cambridge (UK) that would redefine how we understand consciousness, not only in humans but also in animals. The "Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness" emerged from the "Francis Crick Memorial Conference on Consciousness in Humans and Non-Human Animals," marking a turning point in the field of neuroscience and animal ethics.
 
The conference, organized in honor of the renowned neuroscientist Francis Crick, brought together experts from various disciplines to discuss the neurological basis of consciousness. Among the attendees and signatories of the declaration were notable figures such as Jaak Panksepp, Diana Reiss, David Edelman, Bruno Van Swinderen, and Christof Koch. The declaration was drafted by Philip Low and reviewed by this group of scientists, signed in the presence of Stephen Hawking, which underscored its significance.
 
The 2012 Cambridge Declaration explicitly states:
 
"Convergent evidence indicates that non-human animals have the neuroanatomical, neurochemical, and neurophysiological substrates of conscious states along with the capacity to exhibit intentional behaviors. Therefore, we conclude that humans are not the unique possessors of the neurological substrates that generate consciousness."
 
This declaration is significant because:
 
It includes mammals and birds: It specifically notes that both mammals and birds have the neurological foundations for consciousness.
Mentions other animals: It also suggests that other organisms, like octopuses, might possess these neurobiological substrates, although more research is required.
Recognizes intentional behaviors: It acknowledges that certain behaviors in non-human animals can be indicative of consciousness.
 
The Cambridge Declaration has several profound implications:
 
Animal ethics and welfare: By recognizing that animals can experience conscious states, it reinforces the need to reconsider animal welfare practices in agriculture, experimentation, and conservation.
Animal rights: This recognition could catalyze more robust policies for animal protection, supporting the argument that animals have rights based on their ability to feel and be conscious.
Scientific research: It influences how neuroscience and comparative biology studies are conducted, encouraging more empathetic and respectful research towards animal subjects.
Public education and awareness: It provides a scientific foundation for educating the public about the complexity of animals, fostering greater empathy and understanding towards them.
 
However, the declaration does not specify the degree or complexity of consciousness in different species, leaving room for varied interpretations about how "conscious" animals are. While it points to the existence of neurological substrates for consciousness, more studies are needed to fully understand how consciousness manifests in different animals. Additionally, the application of these findings into laws and cultural practices remains pending.
 
We can conclude that the 2012 "Cambridge Declaration" is more than a document; it's an invitation to rethink our relationship with the animal world. It has opened doors for a more informed and ethical dialogue about consciousness, impacting not just science but also philosophy, ethics, and politics. As we continue to explore the animal mind, this declaration will serve as a beacon, reminding us that consciousness is a phenomenon more widespread in the animal kingdom than we had previously imagined.
 

An enthralling story of love, friendship and honor in the Olympic Games (2,600 years ago)
“Life debt” (Vicente Fisac, Amazon): https://a.co/d/hono34C